Obama Misspeaks On Jerusalem...Forced To Backpedal

One day into his "presumptive nominee" status, and Barack Obama is already showing how incredibly relevant and dangerous his inexperience will be should he be elected. Trying to outdo John McCain during an AIPAC speech, Barack said that Jerusalem should remain the undivided capital of Israel. American foreign policy on this matter has long been that the two parties should settle the dispute themselves. Ed Morrisey at Hot Air explains:

The US has no official position on the status of Jerusalem other than to insist that the two parties work it out between themselves. It is considered one of the most sensitive points in negotiations between the PA and Israel, and most diplomats avoid mentioning it at all to avoid unnecessary provocations while trying to get the two parties to talk.
Obama apparently doesn’t know that — because he hasn’t any experience at it.

True dat, Ed. So incredibly dubious and uneducated was Barack's statement that it sparked outrage from Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas, forcing Obambi to once again "clarify his remarks" saying that "Well, obviously, it's going to be up to the parties to negotiate a range of these issues."

So which is it Barry? Should Jerusalem remain the undevided capital of our ally Israel, or should the two parties involved just hash it out between themselves? Should the United States back Israel's position or the Palestinians'? Or is the whole mess just too confusing for an inexperienced, unprepared and altogether wimp of a man like yourself to tackle?

Congratualtions, Democrats, you've managed to nominate the most unqualified person in history to be leader of the free world.